Launcher Option 2: Space Shuttle and Titan
Using one Space Shuttle launch and a Titan IV cuts
the cost of launch, and still uses solely American launchers. It saves $100 M
from one of the launches, as the Titan IV is (only) $300 M. The Titan IV
also has a slightly larger payload shroud than the Space Shuttle, which is
very useful when handling low-density cryogenic hydrogen. Also, the Titan
is able to carry cryogenics, which is a hole in the all-Shuttle plan.
At a total cost of at least $700 M, this is still a very expensive
launch setup. Having one of the launchers not man-rated (the Titan has
mediocre reliability) reduces the flexibility of launching the
crew. The lack of a second mission with a Remote Manipulator
System, and the flexibility of a flight crew present adds to mission risk
and detracts more from flexibility.
The Titan IV has a lower payload capacity than the Space Shuttle, and we will in
all likelihood need another small launch, or sacrifice significant mission
objectives. A Titan III is another $100 M, and has a capacity of 26,000 lbs
(12,000 kg).
The Titan IV has a payload of about 48,000 lbs (22,000 kg), and the
Space Shuttle, 55,000 lbs (25,000 kg) [which may be upgraded to about
62,000 lbs (28,000 kg)]. This gives a total capacity of
103,000 - 110,000 lbs (47,000 - 50,000 kg). This is just borderline
feasible for the manned mission in terms of payload capacity, and it is
likely another small launch would have to be booked. For another $100 M, a
Titan III could be
bought, which would bring total payload capacity up to a nice 129,000 -
136,000 lbs (59,000 - 62,000 kg), but for a whopping $800 M.
| Launcher | Payload | Cost |
| Shuttle + Titan IV | 103,000 lbs (47,000 kg) | $700 M |
| Shuttle (upgrade) + Titan IV | 110,000 lbs (50,000 kg) | $700 M |
| Shuttle + Titan IV + Titan III | 129,000 lbs (59,000 kg) | $800 M |
| Shuttle (upgrade) + Titan IV + Titan III | 136,000 lbs (62,000 kg) | $800 M |
Although it has a higher payload than the two Shuttles option, it lacks a
second man-rated launch and adds the complexity of a second rendezvous, and
it is no cheaper, so this is an unlikely scenario.
ASI W9800566r1.2.
Copyright © 2007 Artemis Society International, for the
contributors. All rights reserved.
This web site contains many trade names and copyrighted articles and images.
Refer to the copyright page for terms of use.
Author:
Simon Rowland.
<simon@eagle.ca>
Maintained by
Jeremy Kraemer
.
Submit update to this page.
Maintained with WebSite Director.
Updated Mon, Jul 20, 1998.